Introduction

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) was first recognized in the United States in 1981 although the disease had already emerged in Sub-Saharan Africa.  Twenty years later AIDS has become one of the most serious pandemics of all time.  By the end of 2000, an estimated 36.1 million people around the world are living with HIV/AIDS; almost half of them are women.  Through the end of 2000, cumulative AIDS-associated deaths around the world were estimated to be 21.8 million.  The majority of those infected and dying from HIV disease are young adults, struck down in the prime of their lives when they ought to be at their healthiest and most productive.

The AIDS pandemic is really a complex picture of multiple epidemics with different patterns of transmission and different HIV subtypes predominating in various parts of the globe.  We have allowed the AIDS pandemic to become a "them and us" situation.  For example, of the 36.1 million people living with HIV/AIDS, 25.3 million (70%!) live in Sub-Saharan Africa.  Of the 3 million deaths AIDS-related deaths reported in year 2000, 2.4 million were in Sub-Saharan Africa.  Of the 5.3 milion adults newly-infected in year 2000, 3.8 million of these occured in Sub-Saharan Africa.  For the majority of these individuals, expensive combinations of antiviral drugs are not an option and so far the main line of attack against AIDS has to remain that of PREVENTION!

The "them and us" scenario is occuring in the United States.  While AIDS is currently the fifth leading cause of death among 25-44 year olds, it is the LEADING cause of death for African-American men and second leading cause of death fro African-American women.
 

  • For a complete copy of the United Nations AIDS program "AIDS Epidemic Update, December 2000" along with graphics click here


  • These reports demonstrated the existence of the three major routes of HIV transmission
     

    1.  SEXUAL: through contact with HIV-infected semen and vaginal secretions ( the majority of HIV infections worldwide are acquired by heterosexual sex)

    2.  Direct exposure to HIV-infected blood or blood products and needles.
    Tragically, it was known that HIV was in US blood products and in the blood supply as far back as 1982. The blood supply was not screened for the virus until 1985. Meanwhile many thousands of hemophiliacs were infected with HIV and many since have died of AIDS.

    3.  Vertical Transmission from mother to child. The majority of infections are believed to occur at time of delivery from exposure to infectious bodily fluids. The virus can also be transmitted in breast milk and this route is thought to be much more common in developing nations.
     



    Scientists credited with the Isolation of HIV-1

    The history surrounding the race to identify HIV is full of controversy. An interesting account can be found in the book "And the Band Played On" by Randy Shilts.

    The AIDS virus was first isolated and described from a young gay man with swollen lymph nodes by a group of scientists headed by Dr Luc Montagnier at the Pasteur Institute in France in 1983. At the time Montagnier called the virus "lymphadenopathy virus" (LAV) referring to the swollen state of the lymph node. Shortly after, an American research group headed by Dr. Robert Gallo of the National Cancer Institute reported that they had also isolated the AIDS-causing virus which they called HTLV-III.

    To cut a LONG story short it turned out that the viruses under study were essentially one and the same which lead to great controversy. Nevertheless, an agreement was reached by the French and Americans to share credit for the discovery of the AIDS virus. Both Montagnier and Gallo share the Nobel Prize.

    The virus was subsequently renamed HIV:

    In 1985 other immune deficiency viruses were isolated:

    HIV-2 in West African prostitutes and Simian Immune Deficiency  Viruses (SIVs) from monkeys.


    Why do we need an AIDS definition?

    The Definition of AIDS has changed over time as information about HIV/AIDS accumulates
    The initial 1982 AIDS definition was arbitrary and inadequate due to a big gap in knowledge about the virus (it had not yet been isolated) and the course of the disease. The definition could only be based on clinical symptoms of immune deficiency in the absence of an underlying cause. The many stages of the disease were not yet known or it would be more accurate to call it HIV disease than AIDS. AIDS represents a relatively small part of a very long period of infection.

    Between 1983 and 1985 AIDS became reportable to the CDC in every state.  New AIDS-defining illnesses were added to the definition as well as a description of a mid-AIDS classification called "AIDS-Related Complex." Individuals with ARC generally did not know their HIV antibody status.  ARC included symptoms such as fatigue, night sweats and swollen lymph nodes and generally preceeded the development of opportunistic infections.
    By 1987 antibody tests became widely available and the ARC classification was no longer necessary. Until 1992 the Social Security Administration used the 1987 definition to determine disability benefits. Due to the wording of the definition an estimated 65% of women with HIV were excluded from receiving benefits.

    In 1993 the CDC revised its case definition of AIDS. This revision included the sickest individuals with low CD4+ T cell counts and infections that were specific to women. It is this definition that is currently used:

    "AIDS in an adult or adolescent 13 years or older is the presence of one of 26 conditions indicative of severe immunosuppression associated with HIV infection." An AIDS diagnosis is also given to HIV+ individuals when their CD4+ T cell count falls below 200 cells/cubic millimeter of blood.

    The pediatric (<13) case definition is similar to that for adults except for the addition of certain opportunistic infections commonly seen in HIV+ children.

    How is AIDS defined in developing countries?
    In many developing countries, HIV antibody testing and facilities are not widely available. In these situations a broader definition of AIDS is used according to guidelines set by the World Health Organization.  AIDS is considered in persons with clnical symptoms of immune deficiency in the absence of any underlying cause ( in other words, this looks like our early 1982 definition, when testing was not available).


    How have anti-viral drugs changed the face of the AIDS Epidemic?

    1987: AZT was approved as the first anti-HIV drug.  Sadly, it was not unitl the same year that President Reagan publicly acknowledged AIDS was a problem. By then, we were 6 years into the epidemic and 50,000 Americans had already died from AIDS.
    There was an initital honeymoon period with AZT as it slowed down viral replication and disease progression.  However, it soon became apparent that any monotherapy used against HIV would be short-lives as the virus could become drug-resistant in a matter of months to any one drug.  Following the development of AZT, other drugs in the same class of nucleoside analogs were developed.

    1994.  A landmark clinical trial 076 was conducted in the U.S. which showed for the first time that a 2/3 reduction of HIV transmission from mother-to-child could be achieved by the use of AZT in late pregnancy.  Drug regimens have since been improved to further reduce the risk of transmission.

    1996 saw the introduction of a new class of powerful anti-AIDS drugs called protease inhibitors.  The availability of potent combinations of antiviral drugs has dramatically improved the prognosis for HIV+ persons. For persons receiving drug therapy whose viral loads are driven to low or undetectable levels it has been repeatedly demonstrated that they are much less likely to develop opportunistic infections or die from AIDS.

    BUT!  Over 95% of the worlds HIV+ people live in developing countries with lack of access to affordable medication.  Affordability is only part of the issue here, however.  President Mbeki of South Africa continues to buy into the myth that HIV does not cause AIDS and that AIDS drugs are toxic.  As a result, he continues to deny his people access to antiviral therapies.